These details include: "time frames and/or periods for implementation, scope and coverage, planning processes, assumptions and methodological approaches." In other words, participating countries don't actually have to submit all (or any of) the details of their plan. There should be nothing to hide." But the wording in the document would allow them to do just that.ĭelegates at the climate conference in Lima. The Guardian quotes Tony deBrum, foreign minister of the Marshall Islands, as saying, "We are shocked that some of our colleagues would want to avoid a process to hold their proposed targets up to the light. This is a big problem because it doesn't hold these countries accountable.Ĭurrently, the draft reads that each country may (not shall) provide a detailed account of the plan and the way they intend to fulfill it. Sadly for future humans, several countries were vehemently opposed to the idea of an outside judge, so the delegates ultimately had to soften the language in the final draft. One big issue the countries were arguing over was how to make sure everyone was actually doing their part - would everyone's climate plans and actions be judged by an outsider? How else would other UN countries know someone's keeping up their end of the bargain? The document does not require any international oversight.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
June 2023
Categories |